.
For the main project, I am designing a custom forend for a rifle I have been working on for the past few years that will allow the barrel to free float, which is a desired feature for consistency and accuracy. It will also retain the option of using a front sight, which is usually not compatible with free-floating the barrel on this particular style of rifle. For a dynamic aspect, the mount for this forend will also allow for attachment of a bipod.
With regard to aesthetics, I have been considering options, and decided to follow a mix of the two aesthetics I sketched out as an exercise, shown below, as opposed to trying to match the existing cold war aesthetic as seen in the featured image above.
.
1 Comment. Leave new
Epic project. You caught my interest. Props for doing this, as I shied away from anything 2A related. I wonder how far the 3D printed version could go? FossCad has exploded the last couple years. It makes me thing of the “Modern-Sporting-Rifle 15″‘s handguards, which are lined with aluminum heat shields. Free floating the layered 3D print would be pushing the durability. You could potentially reinforce with metal bars/pins/etc. For the attachment of the bipod, are you going direct to a sling-stud type, or picatinny rail? I’ve printed picatinny rails before, and I think it would be far superior than the stud, unless you used an off the shelf part for that.
If I were to undertake something like this, I’d focus on streamlined and narrow. Quad rails, Magpul, etc. are all bulky. Reject Modernity, embrace tradition. Classic M16, Garand, M14, Mosin-Nagant, mauser, etc. all have relatively streamlined and thin front handguards, although the miss the flexibility of today’s QD world. If you haven’t/aren’t aware, FossCad is a budding community and has great ideas on how to push the 3D printer to the 2A limit. I’m playing with a twenty-two 1911 slide in my free time. It’s a long way off, but some fun CAD work.